Case studies · 01
ClickASnap
From an expensive video idea to a more sustainable photography platform
Before ClickASnap existed, the product was a video platform with the economics of streaming working against it. We helped test the idea with a real prototype, used actual behaviour and costs to challenge the original model, then helped redirect the working technology and community into a photography product with a more viable cost base.
- Delivery context
- Digital SHIFT / SKYLAB heritage · Founder-led embedded product partnership
- Period
- 2014–2023
- Disciplines
- Featured · Commercial · Development · Design

At a glance
ClickASnap
How prototype testing, real usage and unit economics helped turn a costly video concept into the photography platform ClickASnap.
Reported growth during the partnership
- 30,000 → 2.2m+: reported sign-ups
- £36,000 → £1.6m: reported turnover
The figures above were reported by the company in a 31 December 2021 release comparing September 2020 with September 2021 sign-ups and 2020 with 2021 turnover.
The full story
From an expensive video idea to a more sustainable photography platform
The project that became ClickASnap started as Videscape, an ambitious idea described as a cross between YouTube and Facebook. Rather than committing heavily to the full concept before we knew whether the underlying model worked, Marc Thornton recommended building a smaller working version first.
That prototype was deliberately real enough to expose the important problems. It included video upload and transcoding, streaming infrastructure, pre-roll advertising and, later, a model that shared advertising revenue with creators when their videos were watched.
Technically, the product worked. It also started to attract a community. The more useful discovery, however, came from the economics.
Video is expensive to process, store and deliver. Advertising revenue also varies significantly depending on audience scale, territory and access to higher-value advertising networks. Those two realities collided when a long-form video went viral. The platform suddenly had to serve a very large amount of video, but much of the traffic came from territories generating little or no eligible advertising revenue. The creator still had to be paid under the revenue-share model.
What looked like a breakthrough in audience terms became the clearest evidence that the model was unsustainable at the scale available to us.
Instead of treating the prototype as a failed project, we looked at what it had proved and what could be reused. There was a functioning platform, a codebase, product mechanics and an emerging community. The expensive part was the medium itself.
The recommendation was to pivot from video to photography. Images removed most of the transcoding and streaming burden, reduced the cost and risk of serving user-generated content and allowed much of the existing work to be retained.
That pivot became ClickASnap.
The important part of the engagement was not simply delivering the first brief. It was using a relatively contained build to answer a commercial question, recognising when the data contradicted the original plan, and changing direction before the economics became an even larger problem.
Marc continued working with the client and specialist development team on product direction as ClickASnap evolved and grew internationally. It is a useful example of the way we prefer to work today: build enough to learn, keep the useful parts, and let evidence change the plan when it needs to.
Evidence source
Company press release, 31 December 2021: https://pressreleases.responsesource.com/news/102244/global-photo-sharing-site-clickasnap-shares-best-eight-photos-of-2021/
Something to untangle?
Let’s discuss the real problem.
If this case study sounds close to a situation you are facing, send me a short outline.
Email Marc